Ethical Hacking News
Oracle's response to a reported data security breach has been met with widespread criticism, highlighting the need for greater regulation and oversight of cybersecurity practices in the industry.
Oracle faced controversy over its response to two reported data security breaches, including a login server breach and a potential data leak from a legacy server. The company's initial denial of wrongdoing was met with skepticism, with information security experts pointing out inconsistencies and suggesting it was an attempt to deflect responsibility. Oracle allegedly attempted to scrub evidence of the breach from the web, using the Internet Wayback Machine's archive exclusion process, which has been widely criticized as an attempt to destroy evidence and avoid accountability. The situation raised questions about Oracle's commitment to transparency and customer safety, as well as its disaster recovery plans and communication strategies during a crisis. The controversy highlights the need for greater regulation and oversight of cybersecurity practices in the industry to prioritize transparency and accountability in responding to security breaches.
Oracle, a leading provider of cloud computing services, has been embroiled in a controversy surrounding its response to two reported data security breaches. The incidents have raised concerns about the company's communication strategy, transparency, and commitment to customer safety.
In March 2025, an attacker claimed to have broken into Oracle Cloud's login servers and stolen sensitive information. However, the company denied any wrongdoing, stating that there had been no breach of its cloud services. This denial was followed by a statement from Oracle Health, which reportedly warned customers about a potential data leak from a legacy server.
As the situation unfolded, information security experts began to scrutinize Oracle's responses, pointing out inconsistencies and what they perceived as attempts to deflect responsibility. Kevin Beaumont, a well-known information security expert, described Oracle's initial denial as an attempt to "wordsmith" its statements to avoid accountability. He also noted that the company was trying to distinguish between Oracle Cloud and Oracle Cloud Classic, suggesting that the breach may have occurred in the latter.
The situation took a turn for the worse when it emerged that Oracle had allegedly attempted to scrub evidence of the breach from the web using the Internet Wayback Machine's archive exclusion process. This move has been widely criticized as an attempt to destroy any potential evidence and avoid accountability.
Oracle's response to these criticisms has been met with skepticism, with many in the cybersecurity community questioning the company's commitment to transparency and customer safety. The situation has also raised questions about the effectiveness of Oracle's disaster recovery plans and its ability to communicate effectively during a crisis.
The controversy surrounding Oracle's breach denial and deception has far-reaching implications for the company and the wider cybersecurity industry. It highlights the importance of transparent incident disclosures, effective communication strategies, and commitment to customer safety. As one expert noted, "Simple, clear communications can quell gloomy news stories and customer concerns."
In light of this controversy, it is essential for organizations like Oracle to prioritize transparency and accountability in their responses to security breaches. This includes providing clear and timely information about the breach, cooperating with law enforcement agencies, and taking steps to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
The situation also underscores the need for greater regulation and oversight of cybersecurity practices in the industry. As one expert noted, "Being open about an attack by seeking support and communicating openly with the NCSC and ICO in the days following it can only help you, while sharing information about the attack with your trust communities later on will ultimately improve the threat landscape for everyone."
In conclusion, Oracle's breach denial, deception, and destruction have significant implications for the company and the wider cybersecurity industry. The situation highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and effective communication strategies in responding to security breaches.
Oracle's response to a reported data security breach has been met with widespread criticism, highlighting the need for greater regulation and oversight of cybersecurity practices in the industry.
Related Information:
https://www.ethicalhackingnews.com/articles/Oracles-SNAFU-A-Breach-Denial-Deception-and-Destruction-ehn.shtml
https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2025/04/02/oracle_breach_disaster_planning/
Published: Wed Apr 2 11:21:46 2025 by llama3.2 3B Q4_K_M
